Cases Archive
Re K (Adoption: Permission to Advertise) [2007] EWHC 544 (Fam); [2007] 2 FLR 326
Adoption – Advertisement – Court permission – Application before final hearing – Guidelines and principles
In the Matter of K & H (Children) [2006] EWCA Civ 1898
Children are not to be removed from parents under an interim care order unless it was in the interests of their safety and a high standard had to be met and applied
LTF v LMF [2006] EWCA Civ 1179
Father’s application for permission to appeal against the decision of a circuit judge, who refused to permit him to make an application for the implementation of an order for indirect contact with the children during the currency of an order made by a different judge under section 91(14) of the Children Act 1989. He also sought an order that NYAS (National Youth Advocacy Service) be appointed as the children’s Guardian. Application refused.
Rossi v Rossi [2006] EWHC 1482 (Fam); [2007] 1 FLR 790
Ancillary relief – Dealing with third party interests – Whether necessary to bring separate proceedings under the Partnership Act 1980 and the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996
Re P-B (Placement Order) [2006] EWCA Civ 1016; [2007] 1 FLR 1106
Adoption — Placement order application — Local authority acting as adoption agency — Approval by appointed officer to precede application for placement order.
Carphone Warehouse Plc v Malekout [2006] WLR (D) 155; [2006] EWCA Civ 767
Issue estoppel; Compromise of possession proceedings on terms that inferred the recognition by the landlord of the tenant’s statutory protection. The landlord was estopped from contesting the issue concerning the tenant’s statutory protection as at the date of the compromise in subsequent proceedings.
Re C-J (Section 91(14) Order) [2006] EWHC 1491 (Fam); [2006] 2 FLR 1213
Contact – Appropriateness of s 91(14) order – Exercise of district judge’s discretion
In the Matter of C (A Child) [2006] EWCA Civ 144
Successful appeal to the Court of Appeal on behalf of a father seeking contact that the judge had not given him a fair hearing