BB v CC [2024] EWHC 2693 (Fam) Tatiana Rocha represented the mother at a High Court fact-finding hearing at which serious findings were made of rape and threats to kill. Despite the father denying each and every allegation, following lengthy cross-examination, all allegations were proved. The judgment deals with the complexity of navigating allegations of abuse with a perpetrator who suffers from severe mental health difficulties.
Final Hearing, Application for relocation to Poland, Re [2024] EWFC 283 (B) Tatiana successfully represented a client seeking to relocate internationally.
Re L [2024] Tatiana represented the mother in proceedings arising from the father’s application for a child arrangements order. During the contentious private children law proceedings, the mother moved some 400 miles away (without the court’s permission). Tatiana successfully argued against a transfer of residence, after a clear indication from the court that such an order was a possible (and indeed likely) outcome. Despite the father seeking a transfer of residence and, in the alternative, an order for ‘shared care’, the court granted the mother a child arrangements order providing for the child to live with the mother.
Re I [2023] Tatiana represented the father in proceedings arising from his application for a child arrangements order. Despite ongoing criminal proceedings, following allegations of controlling and coercive behaviour, Tatiana secured an order for ‘shared care’ providing for the young child to spend 50% of her time in the father’s care.
Re M [2023] Tatiana represented the mother in proceedings arising from the father’s application for a transfer of residence. The father relied upon the 13-year-old child’s purported wishes and feelings, and the recommendation for the child to live with him. Raising allegations of malign influence having impacted the child’s wishes and feelings, Tatiana persuaded the court that it was in the child’s best interests to continue living with the mother.
Reported cases
30th April 2025
BB v CC [2025] EWHC 959 (Fam)
Tatiana recently appeared in the High Court, representing the mother at final hearing following the fact-finding hearing in May 2024. The court was faced with a complex factual matrix and had to grapple with the difficult question of whether the father should be stripped on his parental responsibility. The Judge considered the relevant statute and case law in respect of the termination of parental responsibility and was persuaded to terminate the father’s parental responsibility. The court made a final child arrangements order for no contact between the child and father, and a s91(14) barring order until the child reaches 16 years of age.
PDF